…the average nonprofit has a 60 to 70% chance of getting an addition contributions from existing donors;
…a 20 to 40% chance of receicing a gift from a lapsed donor;
…but less than a 2% chance of receiving a gift from a prospect.
These are the opening statistics of a recent article from The Agitator, one of our favorite reads at The One to One Group, where Roger Claver addresses the issue of the lack of focus on donor retention within the non-profit community…or what he likes to call, “The Leaky Bucket”. Claver ponders the reasoning behind why thousands of nonprofits concentrate their fundraising dollars, time and effort into the “leaky retention bucket” that is expensive acquisition as opposed to “fixing the leaky bucket and boosting donor retention”.
Briefly pondering the excuses that have been suggested in the past, Claver cuts to the chase with a plain and simple explanation; most nonprofits “really don’t know how to improve retention.” He claims that here is “no mystery to solving The Leaky Bucket Problem” and spends the bulk of the article offering up suggestions of how to prepare for a future difference from the past….Here are some of our favorite recommendations:
- Build donor relationships. This is the high level answer to retendtion. How to improve and measure the financial value of improved relationships. See Kevin Schulman’s deck over at DonorVoice
- Identify the donor experiences that strengthen the relationship. A relationship is the sum total of those shared (i.e.i delivered, experienced and reciprocated) experiences. In the nonprofit world these include brand, fundraising and donor service experiences.
- Collect and act on donor feedback at every touchpoint. This is common place in the commercial sector. Think of your personal experience on websites, with hotels or airlines, car dealers, restaurants. All of these sectors routinely solicit feedback post interaction/visit/event. Why doesn’t the nonprofit sector do this? No perceived need? No perceived upside? If the International House of Pancakes (IHOP) cares enough (and they do) to solicit customer feedback on the receipt with a simple 800 number and IVR system, then shouldn’t we in the nonprofit sector be at least as concerned about our donors?
- Experiment more. Fail faster. Think about direct mail testing. It takes way too long to fail. And fail is exactly what occurs the vast majority of the time. Innovation includes risk, risk includes failure. Failure is more than acceptable if it is done and learned from quickly.
- Start treating donor service as profit center, not cost center. In the commercial sector and among product companies (versus service), roughly half of the reason a customer will stay or go is tied, not to the product directly, but rather, service level attributes. This means half of your retention battle has nothing to do with your mission features and organizational benefits. A large part of the reason a donor will stay or go is not mission or message or premium offer, it is how she/he is treated when encountering donor services. The opportunity here is not avoiding bad experiences (that is obvious), the real opportunity is recognizing that service can actually improve the relationship and is a critical touchpoint, one that can help to further monetize the relationship with cross-sell and upsell.


